| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Def Antares
   |
Posted - 2004.08.08 08:19:00 -
[1]
Well imo the people fitting oversized ABs and comlplaining a lot about taking away this possibility just shows that the MWD panalties are too hard.
|
Def Antares
|
Posted - 2004.08.08 08:19:00 -
[2]
Well imo the people fitting oversized ABs and comlplaining a lot about taking away this possibility just shows that the MWD panalties are too hard.
|
Def Antares
|
Posted - 2004.08.08 10:24:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Def Antares on 08/08/2004 10:38:24
 Originally by: Holi
Originally by: Diamond Dog
I think they should just set a class restriction for the mwds and afterburners.
there problem solved
That's probably what they will do, or at least the stuff from the patchlog would suggest that.
Originally by: Patch Review Forum - Patchlog 1710-1720
Added a new constraint to fitting modules to ships. A module can optionally have ship groups defined for it, if present, these are used to restrict the fitting of the module to only those groups.
Linkage
--
Holi
aha so the devs did NOT listen to the player base, obviously this will affect the oversized AB's issue too. where are the promised changes that make all booster modules useable?
bla sucks imo. will fly more BS in future and dump the inter. too bad that this will become another UO, where everything that made fun was changed for linear and borin gameplay. 
edit: well i still can fit a named 10MN AB on my frig. since there are no 10MN ABs in the FC hangar and my mirror on chaos is quite old, i can't tell about regular ones and tech 2 ones (due to low engineerign skill). but hopefully the changes are being delayed for the boosters, until the regular sized ones are made useful 
|
Def Antares
|
Posted - 2004.08.08 10:24:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Def Antares on 08/08/2004 10:38:24
Originally by: Holi
Originally by: Diamond Dog
I think they should just set a class restriction for the mwds and afterburners.
there problem solved
That's probably what they will do, or at least the stuff from the patchlog would suggest that.
Originally by: Patch Review Forum - Patchlog 1710-1720
Added a new constraint to fitting modules to ships. A module can optionally have ship groups defined for it, if present, these are used to restrict the fitting of the module to only those groups.
Linkage
--
Holi
aha so the devs did NOT listen to the player base, obviously this will affect the oversized AB's issue too. where are the promised changes that make all booster modules useable?
bla sucks imo. will fly more BS in future and dump the inter. too bad that this will become another UO, where everything that made fun was changed for linear and borin gameplay.
edit: well i still can fit a named 10MN AB on my frig. since there are no 10MN ABs in the FC hangar and my mirror on chaos is quite old, i can't tell about regular ones and tech 2 ones (due to low engineerign skill). but hopefully the changes are being delayed for the boosters, until the regular sized ones are made useful
|
Def Antares
|
Posted - 2004.08.08 15:13:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Shimatu
shields on a frig dont count for much anyway.
the ones on my crow do count for me =) it's the only defense the crow has once it starts getting hit, due to very low armor and hull. cutting it down by 25% from mwd with the addition of being easier to hit (plus not being able to hit other Inters, because they just avoid the missiles / rockets) hurts bad.
|
Def Antares
|
Posted - 2004.08.08 15:13:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Shimatu
shields on a frig dont count for much anyway.
the ones on my crow do count for me =) it's the only defense the crow has once it starts getting hit, due to very low armor and hull. cutting it down by 25% from mwd with the addition of being easier to hit (plus not being able to hit other Inters, because they just avoid the missiles / rockets) hurts bad.
|
| |
|